Proposal Evaluator SME- NASA SRB, IRB, IRT, Studies

Status
Open
Remote policy
Remote
Employment type
Not stated
Salary
Not stated
Categories
Subject-Matter-Expert, Proposal-Analyst, Technical-Reviewer, NASA-Reviewer, Program-Evaluator, Research-Evaluator, Research-Evaluation-Specialist, Proposal-Evaluation, Scientific-Evaluator
Tech
remote-country
Source
himalayas
First observed
2026-10-02 17:22 UTC
Last seen
2026-10-02 17:22 UTC
Source claims posted
2026-10-02 17:19 UTC
Consecutive misses
0 of 10

What the posting says

We are seeking Subject Matter Experts with significant NASA experience to participate in Standing Review Boards (SRB), Independent Review Boards (IRB), Independent Review Teams (IRT), Senior Review Teams (SRT), and Study Teams to assist NASA in the management and oversight of current and future missions.

The EASSS3 contract provides support to assist in the management and oversight of programs and missions for NASA Headquarters and NASA’s Science Office for Mission Assessments (SOMA) at the Agency’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia.

As a CTS Part-Time Employee or Consultant you will participate as a Subject Matter Expert on review teams conducting in-depth technical, management and cost assessments of current and future missions.

Our work is performed remotely & an ideal candidate is willing and able to work part-time on an as-needed basis to support the tasks and has significant direct, hands-on technical or management responsibility.

Applicants must be a US citizen and have a minimum of a Bachelors degree in a STEM or related discipline to their expertise and a NASA recognized expert in their field of study.

We will work with you to determine your eligibility and identifying Conflicts of Interest. A skills assessment and experience summary will follow post initial review.

CTS is an Equal Opportunity Employer. We do not discriminate in our hiring or employment practices regardless of employment type.

Salary: $150/hr. DOE

Originally posted on Himalayas

Quality

Completeness: 65%

Not enough history yet to judge honesty signals.

Timeline

  1. *
    #1138065 2026-10-02 17:22 UTC
    Published